ctcx wrote:Just out of curiosity, what does "empty network-based variant" mean in this case?
When using Babylon it can look for online results without previous dictionary installation, which means without those _sub.bgl files...
Gloggy wrote:Folks, please refrain from posting links to the copyrighted dictionaries.
ilius wrote:I'm reverse engineering BDC format, and it's hopeful
There are two main differences in BDC from BGL:
1- BGL is gzip compressed, BDC is not
2- BGL keeps all the input and output phrases (words and descriptions) as cleartext (with some encoding), but BDC somehow encrypts the in/out strings (other than metadata which are cleartext). But the encryption method is not very complex (they haven't been very smart), it's kind of a character map with apparently a little randomness! This is the mapping I have discovered so far:
(You see there are two alternatives for some characters like O and S)
_ 05
a cb
b 37
c 39
d c1
e cf
f 33
g 3d
h cd
i c3
j 3f
k 31
l c9
m c7
n 3b
o 35, c5
p d5
q db
r 27
s 29, 26
t d1
u df
v 23
w 2d, d2
x dd
y d3
z 2f
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests